Training in water when joints hurt: less pain, 6.1 lb more strength
In short
In a crossover pilot following five participants with a rare metabolic disease (MPS II) that carries heavy musculoskeletal pain, strength rose by a mean of 6.1 lb (about 2.8 kg) during the hydrotherapy arm and pain interference fell by a mean of 16.2 points. Analgesic relief over 24 hours was 45.8% in the hydrotherapy arm against 18% during observation. Six-minute walk distance rose a mean of 44.5 m, but the difference against observation was 55.8 m (95% CI −51.6 to 163.1) — which includes zero. The pain and quality-of-life signal is clear; the performance signal is not decided by a sample this size. No adverse effects were reported.
There are stretches where a joint hurts too much to get under a bar. The options usually collapse to two — stop entirely, or push through it. This study tested a third: resistance work performed in water.
The condition studied is mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome), a rare metabolic disease. The clinical standard, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), delivers enzyme intravenously — and it penetrates poorly into tissues with little blood supply, such as bone, cartilage and heart valves. So musculoskeletal pain and loss of function persist even in well-treated patients. That gap is why the authors reached for water: it unloads bodyweight while still supplying resistance.
What was measured, and how
Five male participants in a crossover design — each person passed through both a hydrotherapy arm and an observation arm, and the two are compared. Three instruments: SF-36 for health-related quality of life, the six-minute walk test (6MWT) for functional mobility, and the pain interference items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Anxiety, depression and kinesiophobia were analysed alongside.
The pain signal was the largest
- Pain interference — down a mean of 16.2 points. This measures how much pain blocks daily activity, not pain intensity itself.
- Analgesic relief over 24 hours — 45.8% in the hydrotherapy arm against 18% in observation. More than double.
- Strength — up a mean of 6.1 lb (about 2.8 kg), with no adverse effects.
- Six-minute walk distance — up a mean of 44.5 m. Difference against observation: 55.8 m (95% CI −51.6 to 163.1).
- SF-36 — mean improvement in physical functioning, role physical and social functioning.
Why the walking result cannot be called an effect
44.5 m is not a small number. But the difference against the observation arm carries a 95% confidence interval from −51.6 to 163.1. An interval that includes zero means this data is compatible both with no difference at all and with a large improvement. With five participants that is unsurprising, and it is why the paper calls itself a pilot feasibility study — the aim was to establish whether the intervention can be delivered in this population, not to pin down an effect size.
The pain numbers hold up better. 45.8% against 18% is a within-person comparison, and the direction and magnitude were consistent. That hydrotherapy reduced the pain burden in these patients is the study's firmest conclusion.
What buoyancy actually does
Water stacks two advantages. First it unloads bodyweight: less compressive load through the joint means more pain-free repetitions of the same movement. Second, water is itself the resistance — move faster and it pushes back harder, so intensity is adjustable without adding weight. That combination is what produces the odd-looking result of moving without pain while strength still rises. How far aquatic training matches land training in healthy adults is covered in aquatic training matches land training.
Measuring kinesiophobia was not an afterthought either. Anyone who has been hurt starts avoiding the movement that hurt; avoidance weakens the tissue; weaker tissue hurts more easily. The experience of moving without pain is itself an intervention against that loop.
What transfers to a lifter
This study watched five people with a rare disease, not a lifter with a sore knee. The numbers do not port across. The structure does: there are real ways to cut the load through a joint while leaving load on the muscle, and water is one of them. On land the same goal is chased with blood flow restriction training, and lower-body work built around a cranky knee is in knee-friendly leg training.
For anyone logging, the thing that matters through a stretch like this is not stopping the log. Keep recording bodyweight and what you can still perform through the weeks you cannot test a max, and on return you can see how far your muscle index actually fell and how long it took to come back. The gap does not erase itself, and how fast it closes varies a lot between people.
This is a feasibility pilot in five patients with a rare metabolic disease and does not establish an effect size. If joint pain persists, get the cause diagnosed before switching modality. Training through masked pain and training around changed loading are not the same thing.
Frequently asked questions
Does training in water build strength?
In this pilot it did. Across the five participants, strength rose by a mean of 6.1 lb (about 2.8 kg) during the hydrotherapy arm, with no adverse effects reported. With a sample of five, the size of that effect is not established.
How much did pain improve?
Pain interference on the Brief Pain Inventory fell by a mean of 16.2 points, and analgesic relief over 24 hours was 45.8% during hydrotherapy against 18% during observation. That reflects pain blocking daily activity less, rather than pain intensity alone.
Walking distance rose 44.5 m — why is that not called an effect?
Because the mean difference against the observation arm was 55.8 m with a 95% confidence interval from −51.6 to 163.1, which includes zero. With five participants, this data does not rule out there being no difference.
Why is water used when joints hurt?
Buoyancy unloads bodyweight and cuts compressive load through the joint, while the water itself supplies resistance to the muscle. Resistance rises with movement speed, so intensity can be adjusted without adding any external weight.
Why was kinesiophobia measured?
Because pain leads to avoiding the movement that hurt, avoidance weakens the tissue, and weaker tissue hurts more easily. Experiencing pain-free movement acts as an intervention against that loop, which is why fear of movement was tracked alongside the physical measures.
Source: PubMed